|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Last Of A Kind: Book
written by Quentin Falk & Dominic Prince.
“Power? Its an ugly word. It’s a sort of egotism to think one has power. I don’t have power over people. I’m doing a job that I enjoy – to provide balanced entertainment” -Lew Grade in 1969“I’m not very good at scripts, I can’t read a script, well you know, I skim through a few pages, I get a feeling, a flavour. What’s more important is the package. What’s it about? Who’s doing it? Who’s in it?” -Lew Grade in 1974“The secret of film-making is you have to make enough films so you get a few hits. With the others you don’t get hurt too much…You must make money unless it’s a horrible, terrible, disastrous film” -Lew Grade in 1982
“The film production schedule has never been stronger. Choice is invidious but if I were to single out one film for personal mention I would choose Raise The Titanic. This was a very costly film which took three years to make and I am hopeful of a very great success.” -Lew Grade If a film empire had to founder on the fortunes of a single movie, how ironic it is that it should have been one as relentlessly mundane as Raise The Titanic. Cleopatra, which almost perplexed Twentieth Century-Fox nearly twenty years earlier, had been, at least, a consistently spectacular beast of a film that even some critics has finally to concede was patchily rather admirable. Some revisionists consider the film a masterpiece. Raise The Titanic will be remembered for three reasons, none of them remotely artistic: its unfortunate nautical connotations, its moment in corporate history and , principally, its cost, the cost of production and the cost to Lord Grade as the company he had helped found was swept inexorably away from him. To attribute the collapse of a film company’s fortunes to a mere six reels of indifferent celluloid is, of course, absurdly simplistic. As the ultimate example of product nurtured within that self-destructive framework, Raise The Titanic was simply the straw that broke the camel’s back. At $36 million – nearly £17 million in the sterling equivalent of that day – it was some straw. The world first heard about the plans to make Clive Cussler’s best-selling novel in May 1977 at Grade’s annual Film Festival party for the industry and press, leavened, as ever, by the merest sprinkling of “stars”, in this case the lugubrious Charles Bronson and his wife and Jill Ireland, who was hobbling around on diamond-encrusted crutches.
A
year later, the main focus was Sophia Loren and Raquel Welch for his
Muppet Movie, and Messrs Savalas, Lancaster and Coburn for Legend
Of The Lone Ranger – none of which casting never incidentally ever
actually transpired – before Grade got round to detailing that “six
million dollars have already been spent on model work for Raise The
Titanic” . Later he again intoned “I’m not going to be browbeaten by
the major distributors. If they push me to far, you’ll soon see an ITC
distribution set-up in the States. And I’ll be very disappointed if I
don’t get a lot of Oscar nominations this year!”. How different history might have been had Grade trusted his original instinct when he turned down an initial approach from authors Clive Cussler’s agent – even if it had been for the wrong reason, believing the book to be yet another yarn about the liner’s sinking. Then Martin Stager, Grade’s number one man in America, told him Stanley Kramer (producer-director of films like The Defiant Ones and Judgement At Nuremberg) had recommended the book, and Richard Smith, chairman of General Cinema, gave him a thick box and told him he’d enjoy the pages crammed inside. Finally reading the novel, Lord Grade was on to Clive Cussler’s agent early next day, a Friday. Grade described what followed to the New York Times:
“I said, I’ve read The Titanic; I want it. I’ve got several offers. I’m
coming to New York Monday, you be at my hotel”…He
comes in the afternoon about four o’clock…”I
want to do a deal, you wont leave this room until we do a deal. I don’t
want bidding. You are either people in a position to do a dear, or else I
forget it”…He said he would have to go back to Clive Cussler. I said “Do
it now, or I withdraw my offer, here’s the telephone”… And he telephoned
Clive, and he said “OK, provided I have a walk-on part and one sentence”. “This wasn’t surprising. I think it’s a great mistake to try and make a film out of a very long novel. You try and condense the book; those things which often make the book compelling get taken out and you finish up with nothing, satisfying nobody. I can’t tell you exactly how many drafts the script went through, but it was certainly in double figures”.
While embroiled in the long process of trying to lick the script into
shape, there was also the matter of making elaborate pre-production models
and finding a suitable tank in which filming of those models could most
effectively be undertaken – some eight models in all: the Titanic
itself, four United States warships, two tugs and a New York Harbour fire
ship. Bernard Kingham recalls going to the States and, during a visit to
the CBS studios, being taken to a workroom and shown “these fantastic
models”, the principal one being the Titanic – fifty-five feet
long, twelve feet high and weighing 10 tons. It really was remarkable.
They said “the intention was to build a tank in the grounds of the
studio”, which never actually came to fruition. There were various reasons
why the tank could not be built at the studios: first, whenever they
started to dig, the hole would fill with water; second it was never fully
appreciated at the outset just how large a tank it would have to be to
house a fifty-five-feet-long model under the Atlantic. Any CBS studio
plans were abandoned and Kingham was charged with hunting down an
appropriate facility. The Maltese melted and gave Kingham the go-ahead to build a brand-new tank so long as he used Maltese labour and the expertise of a Maltese engineer. Kingham found the latter in a talented young man called John Gambina, who had qualifications from Liverpool (England) University. The specifications were crucial: the tank would have to be at least thirty-five feet deep, saucer-shaped because of water pressure, 240 feet across in order to accommodate the model on the bottom at sufficient depth, and capable of being filled and filtered overnight so as to be ready for a crew to shoot the following morning. There would be a fantastic 9,000,000 gallons of water in that tank, so that meant pumping it in at a rate of more than a million gallons an hour which in turn meant, apart from anything else – and there were quite a lot else – the necessity of having a super-efficient pumping system. Kingham recalled:
“I had been out in Malta quite a while and noticed the local electricals
were very unreliable. You’d be sitting in your hotel room at eight o’clock
in the evening when all the lights would go out and that would be it for
the night. So we went to Holland and managed to find four great diesel
pumps that had been setting concrete on the seashore. We got them each
pumping a quarter of a million gallons an hour. The trouble was, although
we had these fantastic pumps, we had terrible trouble with the pipes. They
kept bursting because of the pressure of the water and we kept having to
replace them”. Then there was to be the turntable said to be needed to be able to urn the model while it lay at the foot of the tank. The turntable was built to the specification, which entailed being suspended on wheels and being given a sandy seabed-type covering. Kingham recalls:
“First of all, a lot of sand fell off the turntable and down into the
tracks so the bloody thing wouldn’t turn. Second, the weight of the water
in the tank was so great the wheels collapsed. And third, once you’re
underwater, you’re weightless anyway, and if you’re a cameraman you don’t
need to turn the boat, you just drift round with the camera. But there we
are, they would insist on these things”. While filming in Washington DC, on a large glacier in Alaska, in San Diego and in England helped trace in the story’s labyrinthine governmental, navel and human sub-plots, the key to the whole shoot would eventually be, first, its Greek phase and, climactically, the model shoot in Malta. It was, initially at the Faliron near Athens, around the turn of the year (1980), that the derelict passenger liner S.S Athinai was dressed to appear as if it had been raised following sixty-eight years under the Atlantic, with clever duplication of the Titanic’s grand ballroom, main passenger lounge and section of exterior deck. The S.S Athinai did stout service in the circumstances but may never have got its film break had an altogether more grandiose plan been enacted. Veteran production designer John De Cuir – who knew a thing or two about escalating budgets, having survived the rigours of Cleopatra – had scouted far and wide trying to find a vessel that conformed to Titanic’s basic configuration. In frustration, but presumably with authorization, he approached the city of Long Beach, California, and offered the equivalent of £2 million to buy the Queen Mary. The long Beach authorities swiftly rejected the notion “It sounds crazy”, De Cuir later said, “but you have to be crazy in this business”. In stead, the film company spent $3 million on the two-week Athens phrase, injecting all the money into the Greek economy, as an executive put it to the visiting press, without so much as a flicker of irony. It’s likely that even before a foot of film had been turned, around $11 million had already been spent on Raise The Titanic. Just 46 million in, before the tank had been started, Kingham remembers getting very short shrift indeed from Grade when he hazard the suggestion that it might be wiser to abort at this comparatively premature stage: “ I was told to mind my own business and go away!”. Grade clearly had more sympathy with the philosophy, as postulated by the films producer William Frye: “There is a mystique about the Titanic that will draw people into the theatre. The name alone is so potent”. So how was the $36 million movie’s most memorable moment executed?. (for memorable, it has to be admitted, it undoubtedly is, particularly set against the overall turgidity of the rest). Said Kingham: “We got hold of an effects maintenance technician we often used on our pictures and asked him to take a look at the tank and see if he could come up with an idea how to get the boat up. “You wont believe it”, he said, “but this is what I’d do. We’ll build a set of rails up the side of the tank, put the model on a dolly (a wheeled platform used by a camera for travelling shots), fix a little ringbolt at the front of the model and then I’ll run a cable out to the back of my car and pull her out myself…” Which is just what happened, the remarkable result then captured for posterity on a high-speed camera, showing 350 frames per second, fifteen times the normal ratio. “A water logged mass of unresolved subplots, insufficiently identified characters and a complexity of technical jargon”, was how critic Marjorie Bilbow would later describe Raise The Titanic in the London-based trade paper Screen International. Shortly after the US premiere, Grade allowed himself a rare hint of pessimism when described the opening box-office figures as “disappointing”. The truth is that for the most costly film yet in an already costly line-up serviced in the States by Grade and his brother, Lord Delfont’s joint distribution organization, the grosses were a disaster.
“It was a gamble that nobody could know would fail. The plan was to use the models again, modified in a series of three epic sea films which would more than justify their original cost, But it all depended on the success of Raise The Titanic which, of course, never happened”. “Give me an idea typed on one page and, if I like it, I can make someone a very rich man” -Lew Grade
|
||||||||||||||